| Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account | 2018-09-26 02:25 UTC |  |
| Main | My View | View Issues | Roadmap | Repositories |
| View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Print ] | ||||||||||
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||||
| 0000860 | EMStudio | User Interface | public | 2013-07-01 15:53 | 2013-07-02 23:22 | ||||||
| Reporter | Fred | ||||||||||
| Assigned To | malcom2073 | ||||||||||
| Priority | high | Severity | major | Reproducibility | sometimes | ||||||
| Status | assigned | Resolution | reopened | ||||||||
| Platform | All | OS | All | OS Version | All | ||||||
| Product Version | 0.0.1-SNAPSHOT | ||||||||||
| Target Version | 0.0.1 | Fixed in Version | 0.0.1 | ||||||||
| Summary | 0000860: Range checking of signed values buggy | ||||||||||
| Description | [03:15] <FearlesslyFred> "a bug in emstudio. if I zero out the values signed table (0x1000) and then try to add a new value it fails" [03:15] <FearlesslyFred> "it says something like the value needs to be in range 0-0. so basically impossible to put any other value than zero ;)" [03:27] <malcom2073> Heh oops [03:27] <malcom2073> That's an awesome bug. | ||||||||||
| Additional Information | Requires signed table firmware, not yet publicly available, to test. | ||||||||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||||||
| Issue Type | Bug | ||||||||||
| Attached Files | |||||||||||
 Relationships |
|
 Relationships |
|
Notes |
|
 (0002684)Fred (administrator) 2013-07-01 18:35 |
Should be fixed ASAP, please. Required by midnight tomorrow at the absolute latest. |
 (0002686)malcom2073 (manager) 2013-07-01 22:38 |
Fixed in bf7eee9a8b96269bc14c7af887829ece4b36f4ac |
|
(0002687) Fred (administrator) 2013-07-02 23:21 |
Not fixed, and reporter has been reading your code, quote: "hmmm. fixed 50%. can't input negative values. now instead of 0-0 range I get 0-65k so unsigned range instead of signed and something I forget to mention last time. when trying to access the table the second time it crashes emstudio the table setValue method is comparing against min/max calced axis methods (getters) ex. tableData->minCalcedXAxis() but there is also minActualXAxis() in the tabledata object no idea what calced vs actual means yet the tableData setData method seems to put fixed 0-65k range into "calced" instance variables then it tampers with the "actual" ones... not sure yet what.." |
|
Notes |
| Copyright © 2000 - 2011 MantisBT Group |
 |